FRAGILITY
Because I'm trying to make my project more of a sensorial experience rather than just a flat line up, I'm interested into how I can translate one sense into another; in this instance, I was inspired by how Marina wrote a fully detailed description of her performance, which alongside with the pictures, reproduced analytically the performance in my head without actually seeing it. I will try to alter and interchange senses, so I can make my project as inclusive as possible; most of all, concentrating on textures.
BREATHING IN / BREATHING OUT | Marina Abramovic and Ulay | 1977
INTERRUPTION IN SPACE | Marina Abramovic and Ulay | 1977
RELATION IN SPACE | Marina Abramovic and Ulay | 1977
As even the title states, the two engage into creating a relationship with the space with their surroundings. Besides the concept, I was also very interested into how body movement influences the shape, creating blurring or new outlines. I will try to include the pictures as an idea for future prints, but I will also think about it in terms of using the shapes for the development collages.
NIGHTSEA CROSSING | Marina Abramovic and Ulay | 1982
Magdalena and Bogdan Pelmus made me think about another Eastern European couple who worked together: Marina and Ulay. For an extended period of time, the two engaged into pushing the boundaries of performance art, but also into what relations and connections between two people mean. They challenged vulnerability, love, sadness and empathy in their collaborative work through using their body as a primary tool. "Night Sea Crossing" made me think of 2 aspects: connection and disconnection. Connection, in terms of how Marina and Ulay maintain a constant relation by looking at each other but also how they connect with the different spaces they perform in, as the space becomes part of the performance. But even though they are relating to the space, disconnection is in terms of how their feelings make them disconnect from the space they are in, no matter where they are. I want to try and explore this contrast through my sample as a symbol of how people connect with each other but also (dis)connect constantly to their surrounding as well.
CONCRETE | Bogdan Pelmus | 2009
Concrete was a film which made me think of post-communist Romania and the effects liberalism had on what communism had built over the years. As a 2000s kid, I never knew how communism felt, but there was always one element that will always remind everyone of that era, which is architecture. Building, in communism, was one of the most important things, as they were in a constant industrialisation, as Romania was an underdeveloped country and Ceausescu wanted it to level up to other countries. As a lot of businesses stopped after the downfall, factories and Industrial sites were abandoned; moreover, the apartment buildings started to deteriorate. I was always fascinated of all the textures and the wide range of tones found in the concrete walls of the abandoned sites, in which I will research more for textures.
Magdalena works very often in collaboration with her husband, Bogdan Pelmus. His work revolves around researching the everyday surroundings and understanding how they are trying to change in order to be in conformity to proposed global values. His work is mostly concept centric rather than emphasising realistic visuals, but I really loved the way he looks into how Eastern countries "alter their shape and content according to the Western template, using social, political, cultural clichés" by accentuating how mass industrialisation degrades humans and nature. He tries to create a connection between the human and the spaces it is surrounded by, that somehow dictate its path.
FRAGILE ANATOMY | MAGDALENA PELMUS
As a part of Fragile Anatomy, Veins slowly became a separate project, which Magdalena plans on continuing for as long as she lives. Taking shape of blood veins, she is constantly beading to make them longer, engaging there people in her project by teaching them how to bead. Slowly, it becomes a project in which she is involving the community, one of the things I'm trying to do as well.
Mgdalena Pelmus is a Romanian artist, based in Bucharest. As she describes, her art "is mostly an archive of the diversity of human emotions, a reflection on the human universe in it’s fragility, mapping the situations of anxiety and fragility.” I met Magdalena in 2015, as she was my first painting teacher in high school. She was the starting point in my project, around whom I developed my final concept, because she has had a substantial influence on how I see and perceive contemporary art now. Fragile Anatomy is a project concentrated on exploring different parts of the human body through the emotions they emanate. All the pieces are hand beaded with glass beads, which make the work very personal and emotional through the intense and extensive work put into make the pieces. I will include beading as one of the primary techniques, as I found very interesting how this technique somehow translates movement, textures and form, as well as establishing a profound connection between the maker and the artwork due to the efforts put in.
Magdalena's series of performative jewellery concentrates on emphasising the emotional nature of humans, as shown in the weeping ritual. I really like the idea of transforming something mentally, emotionally, non touchable into something real, tangible. Glass beads are a recurrent material used in her artworks recently, and the idea of using a lot of small pieces to puzzle up a concept intrigues me.
Identity Angst is a project that inspired me a lot, as it questions the idea of who you are and how you perceive yourself. In communism, humans and their rights or emotions were something that was always covered, as the country was constantly putting a happy face on a nation of sad, oppressed people. In each artwork, Magdalena either shows or covers certain parts of the body, to either emphasise it or to create mystery which I will try to use in my drapings as development.
TEXTURAL RESEARCH | FINDING SUSTAINABLE WAYS
SOURCING MATERIALS
VINTAGE LACE | Found at my late granny's house a few years ago.
TEXTURED YARN | Not very sure if it is actual yarn, looks more like some fabric leftovers; found a few clews in a second hand store
LACE CURTAINS | Donated by my neighbours/relatives. The idea of having them from older people is what interests me. Most of them don't use the curtains anymore, as they give that very old, communist look, but they usually keep them around the house.
EXLORING TEXTURES WITHIN THE IMMEDIATE SURROUNDINGS | Mircea Cuza | Bucharest
SHORT STORY
For the final project, I've encouraged myself to establish a deeper connection with my past surroundings, as they represent the milestone in most of my practice so far. I'm constantly pushing myself in getting closer to the environment, from places and people to feelings and states of being. By reflecting on the projects I did so far, there's one common element I find in all of them, but it's best emphasised in the Bianca Saunders Project: the way I'm always referring back to my native culture as a starting point. This allowed me to get a better understanding of who I am and where I come from, but most importantly, how I react to these factors and how they evolve into positive and interactive visuals.
Reminiscing the time I spent in Bucharest, during high school, I can recall the period as the most inspirational and mentally challenging phase of my life, a time where I started building the base of who I wanted to be and how I wanted my voice to be heard. As a starting point for this project, I'm looking back at people who shaped my vision throughout these 4 years, artists who inspired my practice to become more meaningful, collective and personal, and places whose cold, concrete walls became home.
Magdalena Pelmus, my year 9 painting teacher, alongside with her husband and art partner Bogdan Pelmus, are two people who I consider milestones in my practice. Back when my visions of contemporary art and emotional practice were fragile and underdeveloped, Magdalena introduced me to what these really are and she was the first person to encourage me to look beyond what art is seen in our world, and to create a definition of my own: by relying on emotions, on responding to matters that affect us as a community, on collaborating and on the joy of working together. Not only her practice has become a reference for mine on a constant basis, but the human being she is pushed me to look around me so much more analytic. Perhaps, as she states, "art is mostly an archive of human emotions, a reflection on the human universe and its fragility, mapping the situations of anxiety and fragility".
The title "Fragility within rigidity" relates to 2 main points I'm analysing in this project: FRAGILITY; which is found in the human nature, with all it's distinctive elements, and for RIGIDITY, I'm looking into how humans relate to their surroundings, and most specifically in post-communist Romania and in a wider context, Eastern Europe by outlining the forced industrialisation and mass Western consumerism which scarred the course of a nation. Perhaps, trying to create a visual conversation between the two, where fragility has its say louder than it used to have pre 1989.
As 2019 marked the 30 years anniversary of liberal Romania, I couldn't help but notice that there still seem to be loads of open wounds in the its history, as the country is repeatedly pressured into conforming with the Western standards. We are present in the process of how Eastern European countries are trying to "alter their shapes" in order to mule in the forms of the proposed global standards of what a modern European country should be like, by industrialising and exploiting every valuable resource we have.
As the very eclectic city it is, from an architectural point of view, Bucharest is a diverse mix of socialist (from 15 storeys apartment blocks to massive industrial sites), neoclassical and neoromanian architecture, with a new, contemporary approach coming along the way. From the 15 stories, massive industrial sites of socialism and meticulously detailed bas-reliefs from the 19th and 20th century neoclassicism, to the contemporary, minimalist skyscrapers, there is, somehow, a constant conversation between the past and the present, in which concrete walls tell stories of what it was and what there will be. But one thing sparked my interest in the intensive labour of building such incredible buildings, while looking at the forced Soviet industrialisation: the exploiting of humans in order to build them; how those 15+ storeys sit on thousand of fragile shoulders, and how those cold walls emanate the heat and frustration of generations.
After the execution of Ceuasescu in 1989, Romania's big industrial sites were left to rot and decompose, while people still relive the moments in which they were there forever. I thought it was so fascinating to see how I can relate such a fragile nature to something so heavy and hard, and it created a contrast which intrigues me, because it creates a two ways conversation. One between people who are part of the same group, who lived in the same conditions and empathise with each other, in which they can find comfort within what happened but also one between people and their (forced) craft; between people and their past and present surroundings.
RIGIDITY
BORDER MARKS | ROMANIA
In the look for some shape research, I remembered about @bordermarks_archive, an IG amount which documents Romanian city signs. The different compositions caught my attention through their repetitiveness of shapes, which, at the same time, look very dynamic and settled at the same time. Also, the deconstruction of geometric forms to create compositions interests me, and I will incorporate it in my development. I want to use these as my starting point for the prints.
Concrete Textures
These are some of the textures that caught my attention in particular while researching socialist architecture. For this project, I'm mostly looking into degrading surfaces, as they uncover a wide range of textures and tones which I will reproduce through various techniques in my project.
Institute of Robotics and Technical Cybernetics | Saint Petersburg, Russia | 1987
Artists in URSS | Nikolai Tarabukin & Gustav Klutsis
As it is seen in the architecture, the same goes with art. Soviet artists use rigid lines and geometric forms to create movement and rhythm through their work. One more distinctive element is minimalism, compared to the architectural predecessor of neo-classicism. They use very clear lines, neutral tones and barely colour.
The Lenin Institute
One thing that caught my interest while researching was the floorplans of all the buildings I was reading about. All of them were very precise, but besides that, they almost created a very detailed pattern, which I thought it would work well for the print experiments.
A. K. Burov | Club to be shared by the workers of three food processing plants | 1928 Proposal
Volfenzon: Communial house, Moscow (1927-1928) | The First Communal House To Be Built In Moscow
Another element that came to my mind is repetition, which is emphasised in the very tall buildings of 10-12 storeys to industrial sites. The buildings somehow create a rhythm which I will try to use it in my print experiments.
As I am looking at architecture as the rigid part of my project, I'm trying to find key elements to outline it better. The first one that came to my mind is geometric. Stalinist buildings are mostly composed of sequences of the basic forms: circles, squares, triangles.